<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1516 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278780</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the additions made by the A.O. regarding unexplained cash of Rs. 1,00,000, unaccounted investment in land at Naroda of Rs. 29,00,000, and unaccounted investment in land at Chandkheda of Rs. 30,50,000. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds, emphasizing the lack of conclusive evidence and necessary inquiry by the A.O. in making these additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:14:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1516 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278780</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the additions made by the A.O. regarding unexplained cash of Rs. 1,00,000, unaccounted investment in land at Naroda of Rs. 29,00,000, and unaccounted investment in land at Chandkheda of Rs. 30,50,000. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds, emphasizing the lack of conclusive evidence and necessary inquiry by the A.O. in making these additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>