https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16903 The High Court sought clarification on Supreme Court orders regarding CBI guidance, requiring parties to file affidavits. The court emphasized the completion of the conspiracy investigation within three months by the CBI Director. It clarified that the pendency of High Court proceedings does not hinder the Settlement Commission's actions. The Income-tax Department's request for an enquiry in Patna was redirected to Calcutta. The court highlighted the discretionary power of the Settlement Commission and issued a notice for the next hearing on February 21, 1997, with report filing deadlines for the CBI and Income-tax Department by February 20, 1997. en-us Mon, 03 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Sep 2009 18:31:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16903 The High Court sought clarification on Supreme Court orders regarding CBI guidance, requiring parties to file affidavits. The court emphasized the completion of the conspiracy investigation within three months by the CBI Director. It clarified that the pendency of High Court proceedings does not hinder the Settlement Commission's actions. The Income-tax Department's request for an enquiry in Patna was redirected to Calcutta. The court highlighted the discretionary power of the Settlement Commission and issued a notice for the next hearing on February 21, 1997, with report filing deadlines for the CBI and Income-tax Department by February 20, 1997. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 03 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16903