<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellants Dispute Duty Remission for Fire-Damaged Warehoused Goods; Insurance Requirement and B-17 Bond Obligations Highlighted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44613</link>
    <description>Remission or abatement of duty - Damage of warehoused goods - appellants should have insured the goods to the extent of duty deferred in respect of the imported goods destroyed in fire. In terms of B-17 bonds executed by the Appellants, they have bond themselves in respect of the imported/ warehoused goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:03:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:03:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellants Dispute Duty Remission for Fire-Damaged Warehoused Goods; Insurance Requirement and B-17 Bond Obligations Highlighted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44613</link>
      <description>Remission or abatement of duty - Damage of warehoused goods - appellants should have insured the goods to the extent of duty deferred in respect of the imported goods destroyed in fire. In terms of B-17 bonds executed by the Appellants, they have bond themselves in respect of the imported/ warehoused goods.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:03:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>