https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375523 The High Court of Bombay rejected the applicant's pre-arrest bail application concerning apprehension of arrest under Section 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act. The court emphasized the necessity of custodial interrogation to uncover the truth behind the alleged financial fraud and tax evasion, criticizing the deliberate miscommunication by the applicant's advocate. Due to the serious allegations and the applicant's conduct, the court concluded that the applicant did not deserve pre-arrest bail protection, ultimately rejecting the bail application. en-us Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Mar 2025 13:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375523 The High Court of Bombay rejected the applicant's pre-arrest bail application concerning apprehension of arrest under Section 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act. The court emphasized the necessity of custodial interrogation to uncover the truth behind the alleged financial fraud and tax evasion, criticizing the deliberate miscommunication by the applicant's advocate. Due to the serious allegations and the applicant's conduct, the court concluded that the applicant did not deserve pre-arrest bail protection, ultimately rejecting the bail application. Case-Laws GST Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375523