<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1142 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375515</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the assessee could not claim depreciation at 100% in the year of purchase for tools that were wrongly capitalized as expenses. The Tribunal determined that the tools had a short lifespan and should have been treated as revenue expenditure. The court found that the Assessing Officer misunderstood the situation, and the claim was correctly treated as a revenue expenditure. The Income Tax Appeal was rejected, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 06:38:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1142 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375515</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the assessee could not claim depreciation at 100% in the year of purchase for tools that were wrongly capitalized as expenses. The Tribunal determined that the tools had a short lifespan and should have been treated as revenue expenditure. The court found that the Assessing Officer misunderstood the situation, and the claim was correctly treated as a revenue expenditure. The Income Tax Appeal was rejected, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>