<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1123 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375496</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s order for abatement under Section 22(2) and rejecting the claim for remission under Section 23. The decision emphasized compliance with warehousing license conditions and the proper application of abatement provisions for damaged goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 12:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1123 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375496</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s order for abatement under Section 22(2) and rejecting the claim for remission under Section 23. The decision emphasized compliance with warehousing license conditions and the proper application of abatement provisions for damaged goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>