<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1098 - Punjab And Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375471</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the lower Revisional Court&#039;s rejection of condonation of delay in filing the revision. The court found the petitioner&#039;s actions to be mala fide and an abuse of the legal process, warning against such behavior. Emphasizing the need for caution in legal actions to prevent unnecessary expenses and harassment, the court ordered the recovery of exemplary costs of Rs. 2,00,000 from the erring officer personally, with compliance required within two months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1098 - Punjab And Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375471</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the lower Revisional Court&#039;s rejection of condonation of delay in filing the revision. The court found the petitioner&#039;s actions to be mala fide and an abuse of the legal process, warning against such behavior. Emphasizing the need for caution in legal actions to prevent unnecessary expenses and harassment, the court ordered the recovery of exemplary costs of Rs. 2,00,000 from the erring officer personally, with compliance required within two months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>