https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375465 The appeals were allowed, setting aside the Commissioner (A)'s order that confirmed the demand for payment of exempted services for the years 2012-13 and 2013-14. The appellants were found to have properly reversed the proportionate CENVAT credit under Rule 6(3)(ii) read with Rule 6(3A) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The judicial member determined that the demand for payment of exempted services was unjustified, leading to the unsustainable nature of the impugned order in law. en-us Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Feb 2019 06:35:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375465 The appeals were allowed, setting aside the Commissioner (A)'s order that confirmed the demand for payment of exempted services for the years 2012-13 and 2013-14. The appellants were found to have properly reversed the proportionate CENVAT credit under Rule 6(3)(ii) read with Rule 6(3A) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The judicial member determined that the demand for payment of exempted services was unjustified, leading to the unsustainable nature of the impugned order in law. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375465