<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1178 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278764</link>
    <description>Failure to reply to the statutory notice within the prescribed time justified the assessing authority in completing the assessment and imposing the statutory penalty. The challenge based on want of jurisdiction and the alleged effect of non-filing of Form-WW was rejected, as the petitioner admitted that no reply was filed within time. The reference to interest in the order was treated as a typographical error, and the levy was sustained as a penalty under the applicable provision. The writ petitions were therefore held unsustainable and the penalty upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 06:15:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1178 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278764</link>
      <description>Failure to reply to the statutory notice within the prescribed time justified the assessing authority in completing the assessment and imposing the statutory penalty. The challenge based on want of jurisdiction and the alleged effect of non-filing of Form-WW was rejected, as the petitioner admitted that no reply was filed within time. The reference to interest in the order was treated as a typographical error, and the levy was sustained as a penalty under the applicable provision. The writ petitions were therefore held unsustainable and the penalty upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>