<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1716 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278766</link>
    <description>Section 15-B of the Chhattisgarh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 allows the State Government to grant exemption or reduction in tax by notification, while Section 8 taxes Schedule II goods at the rate specified against each entry. The text explains that the relevant notifications covered the generic class of &quot;minor forest produce&quot; and did not exclude tendu leaves. On that construction, the expression was treated as including all minor forest produce otherwise taxable under Schedule II, and where competing interpretations were possible, the view favourable to the assessee was preferred. The stated effect was that tendu leaves attracted VAT only at the reduced rate of 5% rather than the higher schedule rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1716 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278766</link>
      <description>Section 15-B of the Chhattisgarh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 allows the State Government to grant exemption or reduction in tax by notification, while Section 8 taxes Schedule II goods at the rate specified against each entry. The text explains that the relevant notifications covered the generic class of &quot;minor forest produce&quot; and did not exclude tendu leaves. On that construction, the expression was treated as including all minor forest produce otherwise taxable under Schedule II, and where competing interpretations were possible, the view favourable to the assessee was preferred. The stated effect was that tendu leaves attracted VAT only at the reduced rate of 5% rather than the higher schedule rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>