https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278768 A grievance alleging violation of the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeover) Regulations, 2011 was not pursued further in writ proceedings because an alternate remedy of complaint before SEBI was available. The matter was to be treated as a complaint to SEBI, and the regulator stated that it would examine and decide any such complaint. The operative effect was that the writ petition was not separately adjudicated on merits, and SEBI was required to take an appropriate decision expeditiously, within two weeks. en-us Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Feb 2019 06:15:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278768 A grievance alleging violation of the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeover) Regulations, 2011 was not pursued further in writ proceedings because an alternate remedy of complaint before SEBI was available. The matter was to be treated as a complaint to SEBI, and the regulator stated that it would examine and decide any such complaint. The operative effect was that the writ petition was not separately adjudicated on merits, and SEBI was required to take an appropriate decision expeditiously, within two weeks. Case-Laws SEBI Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278768