<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 86 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16889</link>
    <description>The High Court of ALLAHABAD interpreted sections 188 and 187 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in a case involving the dissolution and reconstitution of a partnership firm due to the death of a partner. The court held that upon the death of a partner, the first partnership dissolved, and the subsequent formation of a new partnership required assessment under section 188. It was determined that the income of the two periods should be separately assessed, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:50:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 86 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16889</link>
      <description>The High Court of ALLAHABAD interpreted sections 188 and 187 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in a case involving the dissolution and reconstitution of a partnership firm due to the death of a partner. The court held that upon the death of a partner, the first partnership dissolved, and the subsequent formation of a new partnership required assessment under section 188. It was determined that the income of the two periods should be separately assessed, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>