<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 696 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278751</link>
    <description>Misjoinder of parties or causes of action is a procedural defect and does not make a plaint barred by law for rejection under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. Orders I and II permit joinder in appropriate cases and allow the court to regulate proceedings by striking out or adding parties, directing separate trials, or otherwise managing joinder as justice requires. Section 99 also indicates that a decree is not to be reversed merely for misjoinder unless a necessary party is omitted. On the facts, the connected suits arose from related transactions, shared substantially common evidence, and a joint trial had already been directed in companion proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 696 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278751</link>
      <description>Misjoinder of parties or causes of action is a procedural defect and does not make a plaint barred by law for rejection under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. Orders I and II permit joinder in appropriate cases and allow the court to regulate proceedings by striking out or adding parties, directing separate trials, or otherwise managing joinder as justice requires. Section 99 also indicates that a decree is not to be reversed merely for misjoinder unless a necessary party is omitted. On the facts, the connected suits arose from related transactions, shared substantially common evidence, and a joint trial had already been directed in companion proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>