https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278744 A prior refusal by the appropriate Government to refer an industrial dispute does not bar a later reference under Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, because the power continues so long as the dispute exists or is apprehended. A reference is not incompetent merely because it uses wording different from the union's original demand, where the substance of the dispute remains the same. Termination will be retrenchment, not closure under Section 25FFF, unless a true independent undertaking is closed; where the notice itself describes retrenchment and no separate closure is shown, Section 25F applies and its conditions must be satisfied. en-us Fri, 06 Oct 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 10:42:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278744 A prior refusal by the appropriate Government to refer an industrial dispute does not bar a later reference under Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, because the power continues so long as the dispute exists or is apprehended. A reference is not incompetent merely because it uses wording different from the union's original demand, where the substance of the dispute remains the same. Termination will be retrenchment, not closure under Section 25FFF, unless a true independent undertaking is closed; where the notice itself describes retrenchment and no separate closure is shown, Section 25F applies and its conditions must be satisfied. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Oct 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278744