<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1072 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375445</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the disallowance made under section 14A of the Income Tax Act due to the absence of exempt income from the investments. The decision was based on previous judgments highlighting the principle that disallowance under section 14A cannot be imposed in the absence of exempt income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:37:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1072 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375445</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the disallowance made under section 14A of the Income Tax Act due to the absence of exempt income from the investments. The decision was based on previous judgments highlighting the principle that disallowance under section 14A cannot be imposed in the absence of exempt income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>