<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1069 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375442</link>
    <description>The appeal contested the disallowance u/s 14A for AY 2013-14, where the Appellate Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s suo-moto disallowance and actual disallowance against investments sufficient. The additional disallowance made by the AO was deemed unsustainable, leading to the allowance of the appeal and deletion of the additional disallowance amounting to &amp;amp;8377; 8.95 Lacs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:36:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1069 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375442</link>
      <description>The appeal contested the disallowance u/s 14A for AY 2013-14, where the Appellate Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s suo-moto disallowance and actual disallowance against investments sufficient. The additional disallowance made by the AO was deemed unsustainable, leading to the allowance of the appeal and deletion of the additional disallowance amounting to &amp;amp;8377; 8.95 Lacs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>