<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 48 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16875</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the circular and orders, ruling that the activities of the petitioners in the tendu leaves business did not meet the criteria of &quot;processing&quot; under section 206C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that the actions undertaken did not result in a substantial transformation of the leaves as required by law. Despite acknowledging a previous decision to the contrary, the Court aligned its interpretation with Supreme Court judgments, ultimately upholding the State&#039;s denial of Form No. 27C certification to the petitioners. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:56:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 48 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16875</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the circular and orders, ruling that the activities of the petitioners in the tendu leaves business did not meet the criteria of &quot;processing&quot; under section 206C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that the actions undertaken did not result in a substantial transformation of the leaves as required by law. Despite acknowledging a previous decision to the contrary, the Court aligned its interpretation with Supreme Court judgments, ultimately upholding the State&#039;s denial of Form No. 27C certification to the petitioners. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>