<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1042 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375415</link>
    <description>The appeal by Tata Steel was dismissed as premature and not maintainable. The case was remitted to the Adjudicating Authority for passing an appropriate order under Section 31, ensuring that all stakeholders are treated similarly. The period of pendency of the appeal was excluded from the counting of the 270-day period for the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:32:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1042 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375415</link>
      <description>The appeal by Tata Steel was dismissed as premature and not maintainable. The case was remitted to the Adjudicating Authority for passing an appropriate order under Section 31, ensuring that all stakeholders are treated similarly. The period of pendency of the appeal was excluded from the counting of the 270-day period for the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>