<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1028 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375401</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to avail CENVAT credit based on supplementary invoices issued by the service provider, even though the invoices were issued after the prescribed period and without initial registration. The Tribunal referred to previous judicial pronouncements supporting the validity of such supplementary invoices for claiming CENVAT credit. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order denying the credit and allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:31:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1028 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375401</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to avail CENVAT credit based on supplementary invoices issued by the service provider, even though the invoices were issued after the prescribed period and without initial registration. The Tribunal referred to previous judicial pronouncements supporting the validity of such supplementary invoices for claiming CENVAT credit. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order denying the credit and allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>