<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1027 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375400</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit was held admissible on rails, locomotives, wagon wheels, crossings and related railway material used within the factory for internal movement of raw materials, semi-finished goods, intermediate goods, slag and final products. The Tribunal accepted that such items had a sufficient nexus with manufacture because they formed an integral and inseparable part of the production process. Incidental use for other purposes did not break that character. Relying on a Supreme Court ruling on identical facts and consistent Tribunal decisions, CESTAT Kolkata set aside the denial of credit and allowed the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:31:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1027 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375400</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit was held admissible on rails, locomotives, wagon wheels, crossings and related railway material used within the factory for internal movement of raw materials, semi-finished goods, intermediate goods, slag and final products. The Tribunal accepted that such items had a sufficient nexus with manufacture because they formed an integral and inseparable part of the production process. Incidental use for other purposes did not break that character. Relying on a Supreme Court ruling on identical facts and consistent Tribunal decisions, CESTAT Kolkata set aside the denial of credit and allowed the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>