<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 85 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16871</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming their entitlement to the benefit of the Amnesty Scheme for the relevant assessment years, despite a search operation on the premises, as long as no concealment was detected during the search. The judgment emphasized interpreting the Amnesty Scheme in alignment with its purpose and principles, ensuring fairness to both taxpayers and the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:48:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 85 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16871</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming their entitlement to the benefit of the Amnesty Scheme for the relevant assessment years, despite a search operation on the premises, as long as no concealment was detected during the search. The judgment emphasized interpreting the Amnesty Scheme in alignment with its purpose and principles, ensuring fairness to both taxpayers and the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>