<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1023 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375396</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturing company, in a dispute over the denial of CENVAT Credit for services used in exporting goods. The services in question, including Customs House Agent, Port Services, and Steamer Agent Services, were deemed to qualify as input services under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Citing previous case law and emphasizing the services&#039; role in the export process, the tribunal held that these services were integral to the manufacture and export of goods, overturning the denial of credit by the Adjudicating Authority. The appellant&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the denial of CENVAT Credit was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:30:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558706" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1023 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375396</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturing company, in a dispute over the denial of CENVAT Credit for services used in exporting goods. The services in question, including Customs House Agent, Port Services, and Steamer Agent Services, were deemed to qualify as input services under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Citing previous case law and emphasizing the services&#039; role in the export process, the tribunal held that these services were integral to the manufacture and export of goods, overturning the denial of credit by the Adjudicating Authority. The appellant&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the denial of CENVAT Credit was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>