<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1021 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375394</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, granting them the Cenvat credit for service tax paid under the reverse charge mechanism. The decision was based on the permissibility of utilizing Cenvat credit for such payments during the relevant period, as highlighted by a previous Tribunal order and relevant legal provisions. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was entitled to the Cenvat credit, resulting in a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 19:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1021 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375394</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, granting them the Cenvat credit for service tax paid under the reverse charge mechanism. The decision was based on the permissibility of utilizing Cenvat credit for such payments during the relevant period, as highlighted by a previous Tribunal order and relevant legal provisions. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was entitled to the Cenvat credit, resulting in a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>