<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1013 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375386</link>
    <description>The Chhattisgarh VAT framework treated goods in Schedule I as tax-free and goods in Schedule II as taxable at specified rates, with Tendu leaves listed separately in Part III of Schedule II at the highest rate. A notification granting concessional tax on minor forest produce under Section 15-B was framed in general terms and did not expressly include Tendu leaves. Because exemption notifications are construed strictly, and a specific taxable entry prevails over a broad general description, the concession could not be extended by implication. The reduced rate therefore did not apply to Tendu leaves, and the higher tax treatment was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1013 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375386</link>
      <description>The Chhattisgarh VAT framework treated goods in Schedule I as tax-free and goods in Schedule II as taxable at specified rates, with Tendu leaves listed separately in Part III of Schedule II at the highest rate. A notification granting concessional tax on minor forest produce under Section 15-B was framed in general terms and did not expressly include Tendu leaves. Because exemption notifications are construed strictly, and a specific taxable entry prevails over a broad general description, the concession could not be extended by implication. The reduced rate therefore did not apply to Tendu leaves, and the higher tax treatment was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>