<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1168 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278725</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing that denying deduction under section 80IB(3) in subsequent years when an assessee matures out of the SSI definition would be contrary to the purpose of granting incentives and industrial growth. The Tribunal found the judgments cited by the parties to be relevant and ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:25:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1168 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278725</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing that denying deduction under section 80IB(3) in subsequent years when an assessee matures out of the SSI definition would be contrary to the purpose of granting incentives and industrial growth. The Tribunal found the judgments cited by the parties to be relevant and ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>