https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278737 The court refrained from expressing an opinion on the merits of the dispute in a tax recovery case involving alleged transfer of Set Top Boxes rights. Drawing from a previous case, the court ordered the petitioner to deposit 25% of the disputed tax within two weeks, with credit for prior payments, to halt coercive recovery actions pending appeal resolution. This decision aimed to ensure a fair process and balance the interests of both parties. The writ petition was disposed of without costs. en-us Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:25:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278737 The court refrained from expressing an opinion on the merits of the dispute in a tax recovery case involving alleged transfer of Set Top Boxes rights. Drawing from a previous case, the court ordered the petitioner to deposit 25% of the disputed tax within two weeks, with credit for prior payments, to halt coercive recovery actions pending appeal resolution. This decision aimed to ensure a fair process and balance the interests of both parties. The writ petition was disposed of without costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278737