<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 96 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16861</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the technical fee received for sharing a secret process with an Indian company was a capital receipt and not taxable in India as no services were rendered in India. The Tribunal distinguished between capital assets and revenue receipts, concluding that the fee was a capital receipt for the sale of know-how abroad. Therefore, the technical fee was deemed not subject to taxation in India, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:18:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 96 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16861</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the technical fee received for sharing a secret process with an Indian company was a capital receipt and not taxable in India as no services were rendered in India. The Tribunal distinguished between capital assets and revenue receipts, concluding that the fee was a capital receipt for the sale of know-how abroad. Therefore, the technical fee was deemed not subject to taxation in India, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>