<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 718 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278719</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, determining that the assessee had not commenced the business of the Food Division during the accounting period. Therefore, the disallowance under section 35(1)(iv) and depreciation on machinery and building were upheld. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was overturned, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision was reinstated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:14:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 718 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278719</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, determining that the assessee had not commenced the business of the Food Division during the accounting period. Therefore, the disallowance under section 35(1)(iv) and depreciation on machinery and building were upheld. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was overturned, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision was reinstated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>