https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278713 Review jurisdiction is confined to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to rehear the matter or reappraise the merits of an earlier impleadment order. The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded the permissible limits of review by reassessing whether the neighbouring party was a proper or necessary party. It also reiterated that impleadment under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC depends on whether the party's presence is necessary for complete and effectual adjudication of the suit; on that basis, the earlier impleadment order was left undisturbed and the review order was set aside. en-us Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:14:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278713 Review jurisdiction is confined to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to rehear the matter or reappraise the merits of an earlier impleadment order. The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded the permissible limits of review by reassessing whether the neighbouring party was a proper or necessary party. It also reiterated that impleadment under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC depends on whether the party's presence is necessary for complete and effectual adjudication of the suit; on that basis, the earlier impleadment order was left undisturbed and the review order was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278713