https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375378 The AAAR Haryana dismissed an appeal challenging an advance ruling regarding place of supply for sourcing goods from India. The appellant argued the AAR order was non-speaking and lacked proper application of mind. The AAAR held that the AAR had answered all questions with detailed reasons under relevant GST Act provisions. The appellant admitted providing services including market research, trademark protection, and quality control under agreements with Esprit entities. The AAAR found the AAR correctly identified service classification and tax rates, properly declined certain questions under Section 97(2), and concluded the advance ruling contained no infirmity or illegality, upholding the decision. en-us Thu, 22 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Mar 2025 12:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375378 The AAAR Haryana dismissed an appeal challenging an advance ruling regarding place of supply for sourcing goods from India. The appellant argued the AAR order was non-speaking and lacked proper application of mind. The AAAR held that the AAR had answered all questions with detailed reasons under relevant GST Act provisions. The appellant admitted providing services including market research, trademark protection, and quality control under agreements with Esprit entities. The AAAR found the AAR correctly identified service classification and tax rates, properly declined certain questions under Section 97(2), and concluded the advance ruling contained no infirmity or illegality, upholding the decision. Case-Laws GST Thu, 22 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375378