<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 980 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375353</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that there was no deliberate concealment or inaccurate particulars of income in claiming an excessive deduction under section 35(2AB) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) was deleted, amounting to Rs. 31,85,292, and the appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 06:36:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 980 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375353</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that there was no deliberate concealment or inaccurate particulars of income in claiming an excessive deduction under section 35(2AB) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) was deleted, amounting to Rs. 31,85,292, and the appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>