https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375348 The High Court criticized CESTAT for inconsistently rejecting appeals under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, without providing reasons. Emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability, the court highlighted that the appellate remedy should not be discretionary. CESTAT's assumption that pending writ petitions could suffice was deemed mistaken. The court directed CESTAT to expedite hearings and issue final orders promptly. Ultimately, the High Court set aside CESTAT's order, restoring the appeals for proper adjudication in accordance with the law. en-us Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375348 The High Court criticized CESTAT for inconsistently rejecting appeals under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, without providing reasons. Emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability, the court highlighted that the appellate remedy should not be discretionary. CESTAT's assumption that pending writ petitions could suffice was deemed mistaken. The court directed CESTAT to expedite hearings and issue final orders promptly. Ultimately, the High Court set aside CESTAT's order, restoring the appeals for proper adjudication in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375348