<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 952 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375325</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision that the appellant&#039;s printing of stationery for Universities was exempt from service tax under Notification No.14/2004-ST. The Tribunal found the Commissioner&#039;s analysis based on documentary evidence to be valid, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to a lack of contrary evidence. Consequently, the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was set aside in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 06:34:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 952 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375325</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision that the appellant&#039;s printing of stationery for Universities was exempt from service tax under Notification No.14/2004-ST. The Tribunal found the Commissioner&#039;s analysis based on documentary evidence to be valid, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to a lack of contrary evidence. Consequently, the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was set aside in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>