<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 944 - Punjab And Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375317</link>
    <description>The assessee relied on a Chhattisgarh HC decision in its favour and stated that the decision had been affirmed by dismissal of the revenue&#039;s SLP. The Court took the compilation of judgments on record, issued notice to the respondent-revenue, permitted dasti process, and, after counsel for the revenue accepted notice and sought time to argue, adjourned the matter to 05.04.2019. No substantive determination on the central excise dispute was made in this order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 06:33:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 944 - Punjab And Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375317</link>
      <description>The assessee relied on a Chhattisgarh HC decision in its favour and stated that the decision had been affirmed by dismissal of the revenue&#039;s SLP. The Court took the compilation of judgments on record, issued notice to the respondent-revenue, permitted dasti process, and, after counsel for the revenue accepted notice and sought time to argue, adjourned the matter to 05.04.2019. No substantive determination on the central excise dispute was made in this order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>