<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2750 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278683</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for a cash credit addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Despite insufficient evidence to prove the NRI creditor&#039;s creditworthiness, the Tribunal found the cash credit addition did not amount to concealment of income, leading to the cancellation of the penalty. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty on the cash credit addition was revoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 06:31:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2750 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278683</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for a cash credit addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Despite insufficient evidence to prove the NRI creditor&#039;s creditworthiness, the Tribunal found the cash credit addition did not amount to concealment of income, leading to the cancellation of the penalty. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty on the cash credit addition was revoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>