https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278685 The Tribunal dismissed all sixteen appeals filed by the Revenue as the tax effect was below Rs. 10 lac, in compliance with the CBDT Circular No. 21 of 2015. The Tribunal rejected the oral request for adjournment and granted liberty to file a Miscellaneous Application if the tax effect exceeded the limit. Emphasizing that the dismissal would not set a precedent for higher tax effect cases, the Tribunal cited judicial precedents supporting the decision. en-us Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2019 06:31:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278685 The Tribunal dismissed all sixteen appeals filed by the Revenue as the tax effect was below Rs. 10 lac, in compliance with the CBDT Circular No. 21 of 2015. The Tribunal rejected the oral request for adjournment and granted liberty to file a Miscellaneous Application if the tax effect exceeded the limit. Emphasizing that the dismissal would not set a precedent for higher tax effect cases, the Tribunal cited judicial precedents supporting the decision. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278685