<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 94 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16842</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 80HH had to be examined with section 80AB, because the Tribunal had computed relief without considering whether investment allowance had to be deducted from income for that purpose. The HC held that the Tribunal&#039;s view could not stand without applying section 80AB and the relevant precedent, so the issue required fresh determination in accordance with law. The controversy over the correct basis for the section 80HH deduction was therefore remitted to the Tribunal for reconsideration on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:36:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 94 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16842</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 80HH had to be examined with section 80AB, because the Tribunal had computed relief without considering whether investment allowance had to be deducted from income for that purpose. The HC held that the Tribunal&#039;s view could not stand without applying section 80AB and the relevant precedent, so the issue required fresh determination in accordance with law. The controversy over the correct basis for the section 80HH deduction was therefore remitted to the Tribunal for reconsideration on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>