https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278692 The Tribunal dismissed the application for restoration of the company's name under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956. Despite the petitioner's claims of continuous business operation and challenges leading to non-compliance, the lack of credible evidence supporting these assertions resulted in the denial of the petition. The Registrar of Companies had struck off the company's name due to prolonged non-filing of statutory documents, indicating a lack of active business operations. The Tribunal concluded that the statutory requirements for restoration were not met, leading to the rejection of the application. en-us Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278692 The Tribunal dismissed the application for restoration of the company's name under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956. Despite the petitioner's claims of continuous business operation and challenges leading to non-compliance, the lack of credible evidence supporting these assertions resulted in the denial of the petition. The Registrar of Companies had struck off the company's name due to prolonged non-filing of statutory documents, indicating a lack of active business operations. The Tribunal concluded that the statutory requirements for restoration were not met, leading to the rejection of the application. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278692