https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278697 The Tribunal upheld the Registrar of Companies' decision to strike off the petitioner-company's name from the Register of Companies, as the company was inactive and not conducting business operations. The Tribunal dismissed the petition for restoration of the company's name, emphasizing the lack of just grounds for reinstatement. Additionally, the disqualification of directors was challenged before the High Court, which temporarily stayed the disqualification order, allowing for potential reactivation under the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018. en-us Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2019 06:31:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278697 The Tribunal upheld the Registrar of Companies' decision to strike off the petitioner-company's name from the Register of Companies, as the company was inactive and not conducting business operations. The Tribunal dismissed the petition for restoration of the company's name, emphasizing the lack of just grounds for reinstatement. Additionally, the disqualification of directors was challenged before the High Court, which temporarily stayed the disqualification order, allowing for potential reactivation under the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278697