https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278704 An assessment made at a higher tax rate was set aside because the petitioners had not been given adequate opportunity to produce supporting documents and be personally heard. The Court noted that the petitioners had sought the relevant worksheet and time to place records, that the documents were spread across several departments, and that the admitted tax had already been paid. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Authority for fresh consideration after compliance with natural justice, with a bank guarantee directed to safeguard the disputed amount during reconsideration. en-us Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2019 06:31:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278704 An assessment made at a higher tax rate was set aside because the petitioners had not been given adequate opportunity to produce supporting documents and be personally heard. The Court noted that the petitioners had sought the relevant worksheet and time to place records, that the documents were spread across several departments, and that the admitted tax had already been paid. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Authority for fresh consideration after compliance with natural justice, with a bank guarantee directed to safeguard the disputed amount during reconsideration. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278704