<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1834 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278706</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the decision of the Tribunal and CIT (Appeals) in favor of the assessee regarding tax liability under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found no substantial question of law, as the explanation for cash payments was deemed acceptable and transparent, supported by evidence and judicial precedents. The appeal by the revenue challenging the order was dismissed, emphasizing that when explanations are credible and evidence-backed, there is no basis for legal challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 06:31:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1834 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278706</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the decision of the Tribunal and CIT (Appeals) in favor of the assessee regarding tax liability under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found no substantial question of law, as the explanation for cash payments was deemed acceptable and transparent, supported by evidence and judicial precedents. The appeal by the revenue challenging the order was dismissed, emphasizing that when explanations are credible and evidence-backed, there is no basis for legal challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>