<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1801 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278709</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals in the case, upholding the CIT (A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions related to rent payment, unpaid VAT and service tax liability, and employees&#039; contribution to PF and ESIC. The ITAT found the CIT (A)&#039;s findings legally and factually sound based on evidence presented, affirming that the amounts in question were not required to be added back to the income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 06:31:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1801 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278709</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals in the case, upholding the CIT (A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions related to rent payment, unpaid VAT and service tax liability, and employees&#039; contribution to PF and ESIC. The ITAT found the CIT (A)&#039;s findings legally and factually sound based on evidence presented, affirming that the amounts in question were not required to be added back to the income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>