<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 52 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16838</link>
    <description>A prosecution founded on income-tax assessment findings may not continue where those findings have been displaced by subsequent adjudication of the Settlement Commission and the ITAT. The article notes that once the assessment basis is nullified and the tax authorities have recorded final findings on the factual foundation, the criminal court must give due regard to that conclusion. It further states that a Magistrate should not compel the recording of evidence under section 244 of the Code where the complaint&#039;s no longer survives. The order issuing process to prosecution witnesses was therefore set aside on the facts described.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:26:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 52 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16838</link>
      <description>A prosecution founded on income-tax assessment findings may not continue where those findings have been displaced by subsequent adjudication of the Settlement Commission and the ITAT. The article notes that once the assessment basis is nullified and the tax authorities have recorded final findings on the factual foundation, the criminal court must give due regard to that conclusion. It further states that a Magistrate should not compel the recording of evidence under section 244 of the Code where the complaint&#039;s no longer survives. The order issuing process to prosecution witnesses was therefore set aside on the facts described.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>