https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278677 Good cause must be shown before additional documents can be produced at a later stage under Order XIII Rule 2 CPC, and a bare assertion that the documents are genuine and relevant is not enough. The delayed production was therefore rejected, and the party was not entitled to have the documents received before its evidence was recorded. Revisional interference under Section 115 CPC is limited to jurisdictional error or material irregularity; a mere erroneous refusal to admit documents does not justify revision. The trial court's order was accordingly upheld and no interference was required. en-us Fri, 09 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Aug 2022 17:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278677 Good cause must be shown before additional documents can be produced at a later stage under Order XIII Rule 2 CPC, and a bare assertion that the documents are genuine and relevant is not enough. The delayed production was therefore rejected, and the party was not entitled to have the documents received before its evidence was recorded. Revisional interference under Section 115 CPC is limited to jurisdictional error or material irregularity; a mere erroneous refusal to admit documents does not justify revision. The trial court's order was accordingly upheld and no interference was required. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278677