<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 50 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16829</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad, in a judgment by R. K. Gulati J., ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the interpretation of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that when there is doubt about the liable person for assessment, parallel proceedings may be taken against multiple individuals, and alternative assessments can be made. While protective assessment is allowed, income-tax appellate authorities cannot issue protective orders. The Court emphasized that tax should be levied on the person who earned the income. As the husband&#039;s substantive assessment was upheld, the disputed income could not be upheld in the hands of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:55:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 50 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16829</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad, in a judgment by R. K. Gulati J., ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the interpretation of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that when there is doubt about the liable person for assessment, parallel proceedings may be taken against multiple individuals, and alternative assessments can be made. While protective assessment is allowed, income-tax appellate authorities cannot issue protective orders. The Court emphasized that tax should be levied on the person who earned the income. As the husband&#039;s substantive assessment was upheld, the disputed income could not be upheld in the hands of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>