<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Interest Expenditure Disallowance: Findings May Justify Under Sec 271(1)(c), But Insufficient for Penalty Imposition Alone.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44546</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of interest expenditure - The findings of the AO may be sufficient to make disallowance in quantum on the theory of preponderance of probabilities but it is not sufficient to fasten and saddle the assessee with penalty provisions as are enshrined u/s. 271(1)(c)</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2019 11:39:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2019 11:39:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Interest Expenditure Disallowance: Findings May Justify Under Sec 271(1)(c), But Insufficient for Penalty Imposition Alone.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44546</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of interest expenditure - The findings of the AO may be sufficient to make disallowance in quantum on the theory of preponderance of probabilities but it is not sufficient to fasten and saddle the assessee with penalty provisions as are enshrined u/s. 271(1)(c)</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2019 11:39:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>