https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375292 The ruling authority determined that the applicant, a transport service provider based in Jaipur, Rajasthan, should be registered in Jaipur under the CGST Act 2017. The decision was based on the applicant's centralized operations in Jaipur, where services are supplied and invoiced. Despite operations extending to other states, registration in Rajasthan was deemed appropriate due to compliance with statutory conditions. The authority clarified that questions regarding leasing vacant lands in other states were outside its jurisdiction, emphasizing the ruling's confinement to Rajasthan. en-us Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Mar 2025 12:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375292 The ruling authority determined that the applicant, a transport service provider based in Jaipur, Rajasthan, should be registered in Jaipur under the CGST Act 2017. The decision was based on the applicant's centralized operations in Jaipur, where services are supplied and invoiced. Despite operations extending to other states, registration in Rajasthan was deemed appropriate due to compliance with statutory conditions. The authority clarified that questions regarding leasing vacant lands in other states were outside its jurisdiction, emphasizing the ruling's confinement to Rajasthan. Case-Laws GST Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375292