https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375284 Review jurisdiction is confined to the limited grounds under Section 114 and Order 47 Rule 1 CPC, and cannot be used as an appeal in disguise to reargue the matter on merits. An error justifying review must be self-evident and not depend on long-drawn reasoning or reappreciation of evidence. Applying that standard, the High Court found no patent mistake or apparent error in the earlier order, and the review petition was rejected as not maintainable on the grounds urged. en-us Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Feb 2019 06:31:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375284 Review jurisdiction is confined to the limited grounds under Section 114 and Order 47 Rule 1 CPC, and cannot be used as an appeal in disguise to reargue the matter on merits. An error justifying review must be self-evident and not depend on long-drawn reasoning or reappreciation of evidence. Applying that standard, the High Court found no patent mistake or apparent error in the earlier order, and the review petition was rejected as not maintainable on the grounds urged. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375284