<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 902 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375275</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee, emphasizing the significance of a properly detailed penalty notice to ensure the validity of penalty proceedings. The lack of specificity in the penalty notice led to the cancellation of the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the respective assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2019 06:31:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 902 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375275</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee, emphasizing the significance of a properly detailed penalty notice to ensure the validity of penalty proceedings. The lack of specificity in the penalty notice led to the cancellation of the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the respective assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>