<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 901 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375274</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions of cash and jewelry found during search and seizure operations. The Assessee provided explanations and evidence, showing the cash and jewelry were not undisclosed income, leading to the additions being deemed unjustified. The ITAT rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing the satisfactory explanations and supporting documentation provided by the Assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2019 06:31:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=558236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 901 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375274</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions of cash and jewelry found during search and seizure operations. The Assessee provided explanations and evidence, showing the cash and jewelry were not undisclosed income, leading to the additions being deemed unjustified. The ITAT rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing the satisfactory explanations and supporting documentation provided by the Assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>